0 votes
by (180 points)
By 1930, "Dr." John R. Brinkley of Arkansas, enlarged prostate supplements (visit the following web site) Kansas had transplanted over 16,000 goat testicles into men which wanted to relive their youth. At $750 per procedure, he became an affluent man. Needless to tell you, we will call his practice quackery at best.
The thing most individuals don't understand would be that because of loopholes of the law, individuals can be legally duped in very much the exact same way. You can take anything you'd like apart from recognized illegal drugs and poisons, package it up and advertise it as a food preservative. The one restriction is you can't make claims of any healthcare advantage on the box itself. They could make as many claims as they desire away from the container. So long as those statements aren't made on the container itself, there's simply no regulation on the item in the United States.
One poor fellow which I noticed to the emergency room had a terrible case of Rhus Dermatitis. That is the medical term for what's typically called poison oak or perhaps poison ivy. He had started out getting a little area of rash on his arm. So, he went down to the local health food store and bought a poison ivy treatment.
Right after taking the' cure' he proceeded to have greatly worse. By the time I saw him he had a rash all over the body of his and was incredibly miserable. I discovered the reason by carefully reading the bottle. The' cure' was a naturopathic remedy which have poison ivy in it! How ridiculous is that?
The advertising you see for some products causes it to be immediately obvious that the product is worthless. Anyone trained in anatomy and physiology will know right away how the claims were false.
One great example is as soon as the claims are contradictory. Rheumatoid arthritis and allergies are excellent examples of issues induced by overactive immune systems. Yet I have seen products say that they not only help with allergies but they boost the immune system. You can't get it both ways folks.
The other thing that causes you to go hmm... is once the advertising claims that the item causes specific physiologic changes in the human body. Then they go on and also claim that the item does not have a drug. Nevertheless, check out the definition of a drug:' A chemical applied to the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of a disease'. Obviously, if you're claiming that the product of yours can be utilized to treat or prevent disease, you're talking about a drug. When you say that your substance doesn't contain a drug, next you can't say it's stopping or treating an illness. Here once again, you can't have it both ways.
However, you may say, what I'm taking is simply plant parts. When the dad of mine was in pharmacy institution in the 1950's, nearly all medicines were made by gathering plants and blending them in certain ways to cook drugs. Now, folks do the exact same thing, however, they're capable to offer them as food aditives because they make no statements about their properties' on the container'.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Welcome to GWBS FAQ, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...